Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Annuity Benefits What's The Difference Between An Annuity And A Regular Mutual Fund As Far As Retirement?

What's the difference between an annuity and a regular mutual fund as far as retirement? - annuity benefits

A friend told me that is my investment "advisors" in death, a pension if I am open to making, well, I need that pension systems, and after 8-10 years (reduced rates or what?) Se product. I will be around U.S. $ 260k from another broker's transfer to my advisor. "

The same friend thinks you have to keep for investment funds to ... when comparing the two forms of investment, the difference in total return over the past 12-15 years is not much difference (but it tax benefits or something with one or the other).

Any help?

8 comments:

pgcpaul said...

There is no simple answer. . . Therefore, you should have problems to decide. Remember, the sale is a kind of pension blame. . . perhaps as much as 12.5% of its assets. The fee will not be visible in all forms and is not yet fully open, no matter what I say.

You will spend your funds. Your friend is right!

How do I know? . . . I bought a pension from NY Life, a reputable company and has learned the landfill tax on the document provided. . . but not in time to retrieve my money. I still have a pension, but have never put a penny in it.

Worse, the seller was a friend and he really did not know how to calculate the cost. Agrees that a lot are more pronounced than previously thought. . . only about 1 / 4 of the tax itself, but it was almost impossible to calculate.

pepper said...

Your friend is correct. Charging into an annuity is an insurance policy. The burden of fees in a mutual fund.

Read more about them. Time Guardian.

swenjj said...

only say that both are actually equal to income (i kind of doubt the rent), very few options on what happens when have the money in mutual funds that you can do whatever you want, when you take out, a monthly check nothing, so why pay more for a pension if you think income yet?
If it is absolutely necessary then perhaps garaunteed retirement income for you hard to say, but this money in some treasury bills are already over 1,000 per month in revenue

John the Actuary said...

The straight, direct answer:

Annuity: a product of the insurer, but to remove, you can last a lifetime income. They are as much as you live. You can not outlive your money. The insurance guarantees the payment for you, but at 25 cents to get their hands risk.

Accumulate funds: capital investment vehicle. It is a simple product of the investment transmitted without risk. Simple = cheap. However, you will be responsible for the development of their assets in retirement. Once the money is gone, gone.

Many people at the site of the rescue of their careers is available to advise you see here: Stay away from pensions. I agree with them at one point. If you are in the process of saving and retirement years away, why the big dump on the lap of an insurance commission? Ultimately, they must be able to use assets in a way to survive what happens, finally, to a pension provider.

More tips: A slow-growing market for retirement products cheaper. They are designed for the needs of a person who is a great 401 (k projected) balance and is about to retire. Many of those who destroyed the retirement plans help to try to facilitate their employees' pensions and life less expensive and do not get (and waste) large lump sums. These companies provide "preferred provider of retirement insurance. Since these operations buy the cheapest way to retire and not represented by a seller, they represent a much more affordable convert assets into lifetime income. Look at this effect in the years to come to your employer.

Common Sense said...

Pensions: Very expensive and taxation in the amount of your earnings when you cash in.

Investment: There are also costs that low rates of a "hidden costs" and you can "rate of capital gains to be imposed" after the arrest of more than one year.

Ask what 10,000 U.S. dollars in funds similar when occupied from 1986 to 2006. The return May not seem so different, but significant impact on the entire composition is.

Plus: In the Fund, there are two basic rules;
After a grant is "active"
Buy no-load funds with low fees.

Pensions are one of the highest price of $ $ $, are derived by an assistant. Guess where the money comes from d '!

(Check editions of Forbes and Fortune)

ALSO: Advance return means less money for you!

Common Sense said...

Pensions: Very expensive and taxation in the amount of your earnings when you cash in.

Investment: There are also costs that low rates of a "hidden costs" and you can "rate of capital gains to be imposed" after the arrest of more than one year.

Ask what 10,000 U.S. dollars in funds similar when occupied from 1986 to 2006. The return May not seem so different, but significant impact on the entire composition is.

Plus: In the Fund, there are two basic rules;
After a grant is "active"
Buy no-load funds with low fees.

Pensions are one of the highest price of $ $ $, are derived by an assistant. Guess where the money comes from d '!

(Check editions of Forbes and Fortune)

ALSO: Advance return means less money for you!

w8nc said...

The right choice depends on your financial goals. If you do not need an immediate income annuity may be the case. Why? Due to the fact that taxes are deferred pension. If you opt for a "guarantee" of a pension may also be appropriate. Why? Some drivers have an annual income that guarantees a minimum return on investment - NO GUARANTEE mutual benefit! Therefore, an annuity an "insurance" product. Annuities are not bad products. Really have an end. There are many types of annuities that are more flexible.

However, if you want to use their resources in the near future, the fund can be pursued in the future. Do not pay your only factor to decide ... Mutual funds and also charge a front-end receive "from the upper part"! May only 6% or more in the upscale and will probably have as well as annual fees.

Weigh the whole situation. And do not forget to prioritize your investment goals - the most inimportant step in understanding what is the best investment. Good luck!

stock_lo... said...

I think everyone has a purpose.

The beauty of a pension is no risk of default of a bond and pay a person until he / she leaves. " How long does it take to resolve to live to be a purchase worth it. The company, insurance is clearly better than the other as a result.

They are associated with investment funds exposed to all risks associated with the financial markets, and no funds for many out there these days, and choosing the right can sometimes be very difficult. But nothing too difficult if you are willing to do their homework.

Fund greater control in the hands and some people have done very well with them. Has, but I think the choice is left largely on the amount of time and money, a person is determined. (or for a pensioner who has almost all his money in the dot-com or an accident of the Enron fraud, then a pension is probably the best choice lost)

http://smokingflax.blogspot.com

Post a Comment